Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool2.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!chalmers@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
From: chalmers@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (David Chalmers)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Oops
Message-ID: <1991Jan18.021604.21942@news.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 18 Jan 91 07:15:39 GMT
References: <1991Jan16.035058.7465@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <28087@cs.yale.edu> <1991Jan18.012217.20029@news.cs.indiana.edu>
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington
Lines: 11

Apologies for the lack of attributions on the last two posts.  The article
that starts with quoted material "What does it mean for an arbitrary Turing
Machine..." is a response to Drew McDermott.  The article that starts with
quoted material "There is indeed a specific oversight..." is a response to
Torkel Franzen.  I'm posting from an unfamiliar system as the usual system
is down.  (It also seems to be having problems with propagation delays.)

-- 
Dave Chalmers                            (dave@cogsci.indiana.edu)      
Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition, Indiana University.
"It is not the least charm of a theory that it is refutable."