Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod!ub!dsinc!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: elroy!suned1!zaft@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Gordon C Zaft)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: N0X/N1X Prefixes -- First to Change 1+7D to 7D?
Message-ID: <16041@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 13 Jan 91 08:05:53 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: NSWSES, Port Hueneme, CA
Lines: 16
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 36, Message 3 of 11


In article <15921@accuvax.nwu.edu> cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) writes:

>Of the areas I have listed as having (now or later) N0X/N1X prefixes,
>215, as far as I can tell, is the first to prepare for such by
>removing the 1+ from toll calls within it (i.e., change from 1+7D to
>just 7D).  I do understand (relying for now on the Digest) that 412

This isn't true.  We here in 805-land lost our 1+7D last year (this,
despite the fact that a number of calls in the local area go from GTE
to Pac*Bell and are toll calls.


Gordon Zaft                   |  zaft@suned1.nswses.navy.mil         
NSWSES, Code 4Y33             |  suned1!zaft@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov      
Port Hueneme, CA 93043-5007   |  Phone: (805) 982-0684 FAX: 982-8768