Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: stox@balr.com (Ken Stox)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: BBSs Vs Ma Bell
Message-ID: <16257@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 21 Jan 91 16:10:23 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: BALR Corporation
Lines: 32
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 44, Message 4 of 11


One point I have not yet seen made in the "are BBS's a business"
debate, that I think has been overlooked, is that BBS's must be a
great source of income to the phone companies right now even if they
are being charged residential rates. Let's make the following
assumptions:

	1) Most BBS usage is during the evening and late night hours
	when the telephone system is at it's lowest usage. 

	2) A great deal of BBS calls, if not the majority, are at the
	very least not a 'local' call, but measured service. ( From
	what I have read in comp.dcom.telecom, Texas appears to be
	flat service. That seems to be an exception to most of the
	country; am I wrong in this assumption?? )

So, what is the end result ?? The phone company is getting a great
deal of revenue from times that would normally be idle, or close to
it. What a great deal.

I beleive these points make a significant difference when compared to
hotlines, etc. who are paying business rates since their usage will
probably fall closer to or in peak hours. I always thought the
justification for business rates was that the premium was to offset
the costs necessary to cover the peak load on the network.


Ken Stox [ former sysop of 'yabbs-yet another bulletin board system' ]

stox@balr.com
BALR Corporation        uucp: {uunet|att|attmail}!balr!stox
600 Enterprise Drive    voice: (708) 575-8200