Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf!nadia!ananke!kaiser
From: kaiser@ananke.stgt.sub.org (Andreas Kaiser)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: different member functions with same arg types?
Message-ID: <76.279B57DF@ananke.stgt.sub.org>
Date: 21 Jan 91 21:05:25 GMT
Organization: Subnet-Fidonet Gateway, Stuttgart, FRG
Lines: 28

In a message of <Jan 19 04:07>, Skip Montanaro (montnaro@spyder.crd.ge.com ) 
writes: 

 SM>     class parser : public ...
 SM>     {
 SM>         ...
 SM>         public:
 SM>             parse(char *string);
 SM>             parse(char *filename);
 SM>         ...
 SM>     }

 SM> Unfortunately, both strings and filenames are char *'s, so the compiler
 SM> can't distinguish the two interfaces. Is it kosher to add a dummy argument
 SM> to one member function? It seems crude to me:

How about
               parse_string(char *);
               parse_file(char *);
?

Dummy members are of course possible although ugly, but I don't see any reason, 
why you don't whant to use different names for this purpose. It makes the code 
better readable. It is not only the compiler which might get into trouble, 
deciding which function you really want to call.

                Andreas