Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!umich!sharkey!tygra!dave
From: dave@tygra.ddmi.com (David Conrad)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Replacing INT9 in C
Message-ID: <1991Jan15.114249.25320@tygra.ddmi.com>
Date: 15 Jan 91 11:42:49 GMT
References: <91013.015911ACPS2924@Ryerson.Ca>
Organization: Moore Software, Detroit, MI
Lines: 18

In article <91013.015911ACPS2924@Ryerson.Ca> ACPS2924@Ryerson.Ca writes:
>So far I replace the INT9 with the following, in the new interrupt I call
>the old interrupt 9 to do good housekeeping and then call INT16 to get
>the key from the queue.  Low and behold big crash, why I dont know???
>
>Peter
>ACPS2924@ryerson.ca (Mailing address, it usually works)

Why are you replacing INT9?  Why not just replace INT16?  Also,
what's a `big crash'?  What exactly is happening?
--
David R. Conrad
dave@tygra.ddmi.com
-- 
=  CAT-TALK Conferencing Network, Computer Conferencing and File Archive  =
-  1-313-343-0800, 300/1200/2400/9600 baud, 8/N/1. New users use 'new'    - 
=  as a login id.  AVAILABLE VIA PC-PURSUIT!!! (City code "MIDET")        =
   E-MAIL Address: dave@DDMI.COM