Xref: utzoo comp.lang.postscript:7327 gnu.misc.discuss:2229
Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!uunet!shelby!ptolemy!ames!xanth!oduvm!ncsuvm!ncsuvx!gatech!npiatl!emory!samsung!dali.cs.montana.edu!
 uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!utgpu!tj
From: tj@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Terry Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Ghostscript: The bad news
Message-ID: <1990Dec17.152922.9340@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Date: 17 Dec 90 15:29:22 GMT
References: <1990Dec16.104300.12930@pegasus.com> <1990Dec17.034817.8171@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Organization: UTCS Public Access
Lines: 12

Just to put my 2 cents worth in, I too would like to jump to Peter's
defence.

GhostScript is ALREADY a fine product and a very useful one at that.
If it goes commercial in the future (as so many other products
have... Procomm, Stuffit, Red Ryder etc...) so be it. Until then
stop carping about someone that is doing a good job and put your
energy into commercial packages that cost megabucks and
have megabugs... (eg every x.0 release of WordPerfect!!)

Keep up the good work Peter.
tj
#!