Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!liuida!aste16!felkl
From: felkl@aste16.Berkeley.EDU (Feliks Kluzniak)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: '->' operator
Message-ID: <1991Jan14.195251.9808@ida.liu.se>
Date: 14 Jan 91 19:52:51 GMT
References: <1471@n_kulcs.cs.kuleuven.ac.be>
Sender: news@ida.liu.se (News Subsystem)
Reply-To: felkl@aste16.Berkeley.EDU (Feliks Kluzniak)
Organization: CIS Dept, Univ of Linkoping, Sweden
Lines: 13

In article <1471@n_kulcs.cs.kuleuven.ac.be>,
bimbart@kulcs.cs.kuleuven.ac.be (Bart Demoen) writes:

|> The standard committee has been critisized a lot for designing a new
language
|> instead of standardising an old one, and that's why certain things can't be
|> done, however much we can regret this.

This is interesting. Does it mean that the committee has not, after all,
designed a new language?  If it hasn't, the criticism was uncalled for;
if it has, I can't see the logic.

-- F.K.