Xref: utzoo comp.lang.smalltalk:2529 comp.windows.ms.programmer:631 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!netcom!ergo From: ergo@netcom.UUCP (Isaac Rabinovitch) Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Smalltalk V/Windows tbr Jan 15 Message-ID: <21006@netcom.UUCP> Date: 16 Jan 91 02:12:49 GMT References: <20654@netcom.UUCP> <1991Jan14.013737.2108@dhw68k.cts.com> <1109@applix.com> Organization: UESPA Lines: 19 In objtch@extro.ucc.su.oz.au (Peter Goodall) writes: >If Smalltalk V for windows is much like V1.2 for PM we now have the eqivalent >of separately compilable modules. You can actually create DLLs independant >of your Smalltalk image, which you can distribute to other Smalltalkers as >toolkits. Actually, I think it goes a little beyond that. Several Windows applications I've played with (Word for Windows, Crosstalk for Windows) have the ability to call DLL routines. Depending on how kludgy the interface is, you could probably distribute your DLLs to users of many different Windows programs. -- ergo@netcom.uucp Isaac Rabinovitch netcom!ergo@apple.com Silicon Valley, CA {apple,amdahl,claris}!netcom!ergo THIS STATEMENT IS VERIFIABLY, IRREFUTABLY TRUE!