Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!necisa!boyd
From: boyd@necisa.ho.necisa.oz.au (Boyd Roberts)
Newsgroups: comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: What constitutes a good OS?
Message-ID: <1998@necisa.ho.necisa.oz.au>
Date: 18 Jan 91 04:42:01 GMT
References: <1991Jan15.084127.4044@kithrup.COM> <41754@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <5298@auspex.auspex.com> <41907@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Organization: NEC Information Systems Australia Pty. Ltd.
Lines: 13

In article <41907@nigel.ee.udel.edu> new@ee.udel.edu (Darren New) writes:
>
>It has been my experience that bugs in the kernel get fixed faster than
>bugs in the non-kernel packages because more people complain and bugs
>are generally more catastrophic and there is less often a fall-back
>program. This is not to say that I think it is a good idea.

So tell me about the `System V lost inode bug' and its resolution? 


Boyd Roberts			boyd@necisa.ho.necisa.oz.au

``When the going gets wierd, the weird turn pro...''