Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!caen!uflorida!reef.cis.ufl.edu!jdb
From: jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Brian K. W. Hook)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Using EMS vs. XMS in TC++
Message-ID: <26342@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Date: 16 Jan 91 14:15:34 GMT
Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: UF CIS Dept.
Lines: 13

A while ago I asked the best way to arrange 8MB on a 386 for optimum
compile times/program development....well, I had many mixed replies,
and this in turn has prompted more questions from me....

1.  Turbo C++ can use extended and expanded memory.  Which is it better at
using?  Is there a maximum amount that it can use?  I.e. if I could configure
my memory as either EMS or XMS, which would be best?

2.  Would it be more efficient to use Turbo C++ giving it all the XMS that
my system had, or would I actually be better off relegating it to a disk
cache?  (ie. is TC++ better at using XMS than a caching program?)

Brian