Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!pacbell.com!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: Stef@ICS.UCI.EDU (Einar Stefferud)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: Sending mail from internet to x400 networks
Message-ID: <10099.664060821@nma>
Date: 16 Jan 91 21:44:50 GMT
Reply-To: Stef@ICS.UCI.EDU
Lines: 16
Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 16 Jan 91 10:24:15 -0500.
             <910116102411*@MHS>

Hi Alf -- You have my sympathies for the understandable error.  You will
recall that my query asked whether there has been a change in either
RFC987/1148, or a change in the agreed upon notation for business cards
that was adopted by RARE (prepared by CERN).

I have noted that lately the ";" has been most often used in the
discussion about DDAs and RFC987 mapping.  You are not the first, nor
probably not going to be the last person to make the same error.

To clear the record, can someone who has the text handy, resend a copy
of the published rules for RFC822 left hand side encoding of X.400
Standard Attributes, and a copy of the text from the RARE agreement on
business card representation of the same SA information?  I do not have
any handy access to the published electronic texts.

Best...\Stef