Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!ucivax!gateway
From: Stef@ICS.UCI.EDU (Einar Stefferud)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: New Group: comp.protocols.iso.x500??
Message-ID: <12127.664151140@nma>
Date: 17 Jan 91 23:08:45 GMT
Reply-To: Stef@ICS.UCI.EDU
Lines: 19
Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 17 Jan 91 09:11:10 -0800.
             <9101171711.AA08219@hpindqj.cup.hp.com>

HI Brian -- MHSNEWS is now gatewayed to comp.protocols.iso.x400, soo
what is to be gained by feeding the same entire stream to
comp.lprootocols.iso.x500 in parralell, for the same people?

I suggest that you prooceed in MHSNEWS with your discussion items, and
lets see if things should be split when we see how the real discussion
goes.

One thing we might want to do is to remove the "moderated" status from
the current comp.protocols.iso.x4oo gateway to the main list.  We
originally set it to be moderated for the feed to the intenret mhsnews
list because we were unsure of what kind of traffic would come from the
newsgroup feed.  There has never benn any problem, so we should be able
to make the feed automatic.

So, with this message, I request anyone who objects to allowing X.500
discsuion in MHSNEWS to comment by reply to theis list.

Best...\Stef