Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool2.mu.edu!samsung!usc!rutgers!gatech!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!en.ecn.purdue.edu!huebner From: huebner@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert E. Huebner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Okay, you Amiga Types, its time to bash your amiga. :) Keywords: Amiga Message-ID: <1991Jan16.144548.7125@en.ecn.purdue.edu> Date: 16 Jan 91 14:45:48 GMT References: <3783@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1991Jan15.183939.6293@javelin.es.com> <1991Jan15.195612.3795@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> Organization: Commission for the safe & ethical use of mints and lozenges Lines: 23 In article <1991Jan15.195612.3795@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> rjc@geech.ai.mit.edu (Ray Cromwell) writes: >> 2. Major software companies ignore the Amiga. Look at the incredible Pixar >>stuff coming out for the Mac. This argument could go on forever, but I blame >>the software companies themselves rather than the Amiga. > > I think the Amiga is a much better platform for video/graphics than the >Mac. Pixar's decision is probably fueled by a few things. 1) Marketing >2) QuickDraw 3) # of Macs sold. All this talk of Pixar ignoring Amiga leads me to ask- Did Pixar ever say they weren't planning Renderman for the Amiga? Granted, the Mac is a much higher priority in terms of profit potential, but at a recent demonstration given to the Purdue Graphics Society here, the Pixar rep. said he was "not permitted to comment" on the possibility of an Amiga port. Or have they stated a more emphatic "no" since that time? >>Pete Ashdown pashdown@javelin.sim.es.com ...uunet!javelin.sim.es.com!pashdown -- | Robert E. Huebner | "Death is nature's way of telling | | huebner@en.ecn.purdue.edu | you to slow down" | | huebner@aerospace.aero.org | - Unknown Author |