Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy (Re: A3500 ??) Keywords: sheesh! Message-ID: <7539@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 18 Jan 91 23:31:29 GMT References: <665@tronsbox.xei.com> <1991Jan17.050949.11038@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <694@tronsbox.xei.com> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 17 In article <694@tronsbox.xei.com> tron1@tronsbox.xei.com (Kenneth Jamieson) writes: > Just as a point, will ANY discussion of Amiga abilities and > futures be relegated to the "riot" of unreasonable flaming in > .advocacy???? I happen to feel that these topics deserve a little > better than that. Actually, the name-calling in c.s.a.advocacy has been pretty minimal. Despite the intentions of some folks, it's been a pretty orderly place so far... the Marc Barret flames (which he has been abstaining from!) are about the only exception. On the other hand a separate "futures" groups would probably be a good idea. Someone else suggested that a "comp.sys.amiga.os" might be worth looking into... -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .