Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!ogicse!pdxgate!eecs.cs.pdx.edu!jayward
From: jayward@eecs.cs.pdx.edu (Jay Ward)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio
Subject: Best Audio Digitizer
Message-ID: <1181@pdxgate.UUCP>
Date: 16 Jan 91 22:51:03 GMT
Sender: news@pdxgate.UUCP
Reply-To: jayward@eecs.cs.pdx.edu (Jay Ward)
Organization: Portland State University, Portland, OR
Lines: 14

To all those that I pass on the audio digitizer results:

Far and away AMAS was the digitizer of choice for the majority of people that
responded to my question.  The point that stuck in my mind was the cleaner
samples as opposed to PerfectSound 3.0.  Also, perfect sound owners are not 
happy that their hardware (again, 3.0) was not compatible with third party
software (Audiomaster II, etc.).

I will be purchasing an AMAS soon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jay Ward --> jayward@eecs.cs.pdx.edu | if (TrailBlazers > Opponents)      
"                 " - Marcel Marceau | 		TrailBlazerWins++;
----------------------------------------------------------------------------