Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmger!peterk
From: peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: How does bridgeboard affect memory
Message-ID: <765@cbmger.UUCP>
Date: 18 Jan 91 08:31:50 GMT
References: <11152@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <758@cbmger.UUCP> <759@cbmger.UUCP> <17742@cbmvax.commodore.com> <17745@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Reply-To: peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY)
Organization: Commodore Bueromaschinen GmbH, West Germany
Lines: 17

In article <17745@cbmvax.commodore.com> drysdale@cbmvax.commodore.com (Scott Drysdale) writes:
>>>
>>>Sorry, my program tells only 512 KB for both.
>>
>>argh.  what was i thinking?
>
>aha!  i was thinking of the addresses that the bridgeboard can reside at.  the
>bridgeboard can only live on 2 meg address boundaries.

Hmm, is this at all allowed in the autoconfig mechanism? I always
thought that autoconfig memory space is managed in 64 KB chunks.
Is then a board allowed to say "No, I don't like the address that
the system gave me, I WANT a 2 meg boundary!" ???

-- 
Best regards, Dr. Peter Kittel  // E-Mail to  \\  Only my personal opinions... 
Commodore Frankfurt, Germany  \X/ {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!cbmger!peterk