Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!volcano.Berkeley.EDU!kawakami From: kawakami@volcano.Berkeley.EDU (John Kawakami) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st.tech Subject: Re: SCSI observation Message-ID: <1991Jan20.031523.14456@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 20 Jan 91 03:15:23 GMT References: <1991Jan19.161057.44274@vaxb.acs.unt.edu> Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator) Organization: ucb Lines: 29 In article <1991Jan19.161057.44274@vaxb.acs.unt.edu> kenc@vaxb.acs.unt.edu writes: > What I'm getting at is that the mechanisms SHOULD work interchangably, right? > If the ST can 'see' the SCSI device, then is there any reason the Spectre >won't? Seems like you'd just have to format a spectre-specific partition, and >you're off and running... > > >+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------------+ >| Ken Corey | | >| kenc@vaxb.acs.unt.edu | "Look, I just can't work up the energy | >| SysOp:Intersect BBS | to be concerned about apathy." | >| 214/317-5722 | | >+--Disclaimer: These opinions are mine. Hell, I can barely GIVE 'em away!---+ The SCSI-Spectre incompatibility problem probably has more to do with the way the Mac software deals with SCSI. Dave Small seems to have written software to convert the Mac disk file I/O into something that the Atari/GCR can do. Mac SCSI devices probably demand more specificity and might even bypass the OS software if it is inadequate. If the last thing is not the case, then there might be a software (non megatalk) method of using Mac SCSI devices on the ST. Of course, since Small was revving up with appletalk compatibility anyway, it probably made more sense to do SCSI in hardware anyway. John Kawakami kawakami@ocf.berkeley.edu ucbvax!ocf.berkeley.edu!kawakami Amateur crank! My Atari Macks!