Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.hardware:7953 comp.sys.mac.system:2894 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!fnal.fnal.gov!yossie From: yossie@fnal.fnal.gov (Yossie Silverman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: IIcx ROM Question Message-ID: <}^1|F&@linac.fnal.gov> Date: 18 Jan 91 20:15:10 GMT Sender: usenet@linac.fnal.gov Organization: Fermilab Lines: 12 References:<11707@goofy.Apple.COM> <1991Jan15.133603.9346@cbnews.att.com> <13076@spt.entity.com> <1991Jan17.180702.9923@pyro.ei.dupont.com> My impression, from having worked with a few MacIIci's, is that the main difference between those that run most anything (without any problems) and those that run with lots of problems, is the video board/internal. I plan on buying a board for my home machine very soon, to use instead of the internal circuitry. I am thinking of a RasterOps 386 ($799 at one place I called!) - Yossie --- yossie@fnal.fnal.gov; yossie@fnccf.bitnet What did the Caspian Sea? - Saki