Path: utzoo!attcan!lsuc!maccs!cs4ed3ap From: cs4ed3ap@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Tyldesly A) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: They Are shipping in volume??? Message-ID: <2793CA1D.9905@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> Date: 16 Jan 91 03:35:57 GMT References: < <278E3748.18058@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca>> Organization: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Lines: 20 In article scott@mcs-server.gac.edu (Scott Hess) writes: >In article <278E3748.18058@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> cs4ed3ap@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Tyldesly A) writes: > Here, here. It is _almost_ nice to here that I'm note the only one that is > getting jerked around by next. Our university, along with a number of others ...[stuff deleted]... >I think that we all realized about Novemember 14, when the first machines >shipped, I believe, that our machines were not going to be there the >15th. Yes, it's taken 2 months, but from the sounds of it NeXT's only >just lately started getting production '040, which they could hardly >help. I agree entirely and so I don't thinnk it was prudent of Next to repeatedly tell us taht the machines had been shipped to US in November when that implied they have been in transit for 2months. This seems a long time to me but maybe I'm wrong.The point is that I wasn't going by when they first started shiping but by when they said they had shipped to us. Andrew