Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!buchanan From: buchanan@cs.ubc.ca (John (juancho) buchanan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi Subject: touching a sgi file from a sun Message-ID: <1991Jan18.001557.25918@cs.ubc.ca> Date: 18 Jan 91 00:15:57 GMT Sender: news@cs.ubc.ca (Usenet News) Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 44 We ran into an interesting problem here, I think it points out a bug but I don't know wether to point the finger at sgi or at sun. This is the scenario. IRIX 3.3.1 exports a file system. SPARC1 runing SUNOS 4.1 imports. On the sun sparcstation I get the following weird interaction. chaplin [48] ~ % ls -l foo -rw-r--r-- 1 buchanan 0 Jan 17 16:09 foo chaplin [49] ~ % touch foo chaplin [50] ~ % ls -l foo -rw-r--r-- 1 buchanan 0 Dec 31 1969 foo (The wierdness is the date on the second listing of the file) When this is done on a filesystem exported from a IRIX 3.2.1 system the interaction is correct. This seems to be a problem that came about during the upgrade to 3.3.1, however, we also upgraded the sun around that time so it is possible that the problem lies with that other company. ========================================================================= | |===============================| | John Buchanan (juancho) | buchanan@cs.ubc.ca | | Imager Manager |===============================| | Imager | (604) 228-2218 | | Department of Computer Science |===============================| | University of British Columbia | Standard disclaimer | | Vancouver, BC, Canada | included in this | | | box, right here. | ========================================================================= | This from ;login: (The USENIX Association Newsletter), Sep/Oct 1990, | | in a report on a Usenix Standards BOF session: | | | | An overheard conversation: | | | | -"Mach was the greatest intellectual fraud in the last ten years." | | | | -"What about X?" | | | | -"I said `intellectual' " | | | =========================================================================