Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!ksand
From: ksand@Apple.COM (Kent Sandvik)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aux
Subject: Re: Interchangeability Fx/Cx
Message-ID: <48194@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 17 Jan 91 03:04:52 GMT
References: <62149@bbn.BBN.COM>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA
Lines: 16

In article <62149@bbn.BBN.COM> seibel@bbn.com (Fred Seibel) writes:
>
>Is it possible to take the disk and system configured for a MacIIcx, and plug
>it into a MacIIfx and expect it to work without any reconfiguration?

Interesting theoretical question. I don't personally know if you
have for instance same cards in the same slot IDs in the machines would 
avoid a reconfiguration. In most cases it's maybe better that the
system does a reconfig when encountering new cards though.

Regards, Kent Sandvik

-- 
Kent Sandvik, Apple Computer Inc, Developer Technical Support
NET:ksand@apple.com, AppleLink: KSAND  DISCLAIMER: Private mumbo-jumbo
Zippy++ says: "The ANSI C++ Standard should be an object oriented model"