Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!kth.se!cyklop.nada.kth.se!news From: d88-jwa@dront.nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aux Subject: Re: A/UX 2.0 curses - buggy at the best ? Message-ID: <1991Jan22.193121.26938@nada.kth.se> Date: 22 Jan 91 19:31:21 GMT References: <1991Jan20.225350.16448@nada.kth.se> <2866@redstar.cs.qmw.ac.uk> Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 39 In article <> liam@cs.qmw.ac.uk (William Roberts;) writes: >>I've tried to use the supplied AUX curses library, and run into >Which version of curses are you using? The choices under A/UX are: >>2) A_BOLD changes the spacing of the text as well as boldifying it. >> Making this work in a sensible way would be trivial. (This might I believe the attributes aren't available under BSD curses ? It's the terminfo version, for sure. >This is a problem due to the CommandShell - it tries to get bold text (as >distinct from reverse mode and underline mode) by the old daisywheel trick of Well, moving left one pixel after drawing each character would make things work in a much better way. I PLEAD for this being implemented ! >>3) The keypad ( ) numbers don't work very well either - the arrow >This is due to a bug in the handling of multi-byte character sequences with >select/raw mode input - it was described on this newsgroup some while ago and >I worked away at it a bit and sent in a proper SPR on it. Let's hope... 2.0.1 is due soon... >the CommandShell terminal emulation problem is to use the much vaunted Comms >Toolbox and have a CommandShell whose terminal emulation was provided by a >Comms Toolbox terminal tool: we could then plug in our own terminal types as How very appropriate ! A good solution ! Meanwhile, I'm disgruntedly forced to work in the SPARC this has to be compatible with. h+ Jon W{tte, Stockholm, Sweden, h+@nada.kth.se :: This article is fake. If you take it for real, the _REAL_ :: Jon W{tte will sue you for slander. So there ! Nyah ! :-)