Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uflorida!gatech!prism!hh2 From: hh2@prism.gatech.EDU (HAAS) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix Subject: Re: AIX PS/2 patch 1009: Which Tape? Large SCSIs? Message-ID: <19820@hydra.gatech.EDU> Date: 17 Jan 91 03:25:27 GMT References: <19761@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1991Jan17.002027.16571@odin.corp.sgi.com> Organization: Georgia Tech Research Institute Lines: 47 In article <1991Jan17.002027.16571@odin.corp.sgi.com> jeffs@soul.esd.sgi.com (Jeff Smith) writes: >|> 1.) 1009 is supposed to be available in both floppy and tape format. >|> Which tape format? I bet the it's the 6257 (?#), and that the >|> IBM Internal Tape Backup Unit has been neglected again. Does anyone >|> know? > >I doubt they will support the ITBU. My $$ would be on the 6157-001. I received a note from John Canning . . . |I do not know about Large SCSI's. We have been told that 1009 will |be available on a tape which can be read by our internal tape drives. | |Heaven help them if this is not the case. I second the "heaven help" them . . . . If they can't support their own hardware, who else in thier right mind would, and therefore, why should we buy it ?!! >|> 2.) Will 1009 support SCSI hard disks of greater than 512 MB capacity? >|> Either somebody made a very shortsighted mistake in limiting the >|> installation code to SCSI disks < 512MB, or IBM is intentionally trying >|> to screw those people that wish to use anything but IBM SCSI >|> disks. >|> If it was just an unintentional mistake, then surely it has been >|> corrected by now. Surely? > >Until recently I had a PS/2 with 2 620M RS/6000 external SCSI's hooked up to >the cached adapter no problem. The machine is still running with one of >these drives. However I had the OS on a 120M ESDI drive. There are hacks to >allow installation on any disk, which somebody from LCC could probably post. > >jeffs@sgi.com >(ex-AIX and other random UNIX OS on PS/2 development) I performed a "hack" myself, as instructed by a very kind and generous AIX user. AIX installed (aparently) fine, but I now cannot use my Internal Tape Backup, nor can I enable my serial port. Since the only change was the hack, I must assume . . Either way, if IBM claims to provide SCSI compatibility, what's the *$^@^ problem ??? hh -- Harry Haas GTRI/RIDL/DB "What makes it DO that!?" - Bones Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!hh2 Internet: hh2@prism.gatech.edu hhaas@{gtri01|rmadsun}.gatech.edu