Xref: utzoo comp.unix.shell:1274 comp.unix.programmer:853
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!bria!mike
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: A visual unix shell?
Keywords: visual, windows, ksh
Message-ID: <364@bria>
Date: 17 Jan 91 23:17:32 GMT
References: <760@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Reply-To: uunet!bria!mike (Michael Stefanik)
Followup-To: comp.unix.shell
Organization: Briareus Corporation, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 20

In article <760@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM> cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM!heymann (Jurgen Heymann) writes:
>
>Is there a Norton Commander like unix shell somewhere? If not, is anyone
>interested and motivated in building one? Maybe we then should have a
>discussion about desired features as well? If there is no "visual shell"
>out there yet (I'm not aware of any), I want to suggest an effort to
>make/get/... one in the discussion below.

Although I personally bristle at the very *thought* of Pete Norton's stuff
running under UNIX, there is indeed a version slated for XENIX, and I'm sure
that other UNIX flavors will be targeted.

Although I have nothing against my neighboring Santa Monican, I really *won't*
be holding my breath ...
-- 
Michael Stefanik, Systems Engineer (JOAT), Briareus Corporation
UUCP: ...!uunet!bria!mike
--
technoignorami (tek'no-ig'no-ram`i) a group of individuals that are constantly
found to be saying things like "Well, it works on my DOS machine ..."