Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!ora!daemon
From: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: sexist space
Message-ID: <663891996@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 15 Jan 91 16:22:41 GMT
References: <9101072032.AA28202@easynet.crl.dec.com> <1991Jan13.052322.9783@athena.cs.uga.edu>
Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz)
Organization: The Piranha Club
Lines: 13
Approved: ambar@ora.com

In article <1991Jan13.052322.9783@athena.cs.uga.edu> stabler@athena.cs.uga.edu (Kathi Mills) writes:
>they are not absolute.  If a person can prove that s/he is put at a
>serious disadvantage which outweighs the right of an organized group
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>to the above freedoms, then the freedoms of the group must be limited.
>Basically, your freedom of association ends where my career begins is
>what I'm saying.

Please define "serious disadvantage".

E.g. if a man can't be admitted to Mills College, is he in serious
disadvantage?  If a woman can't be admitted to a men's only college,
is she in serious disadvantage?