Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!spool2.mu.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!FCRFV1.NCIFCRF.GOV!gunnell From: gunnell@FCRFV1.NCIFCRF.GOV ("Gunnell, Mark") Newsgroups: bionet.software Subject: (none) Message-ID: <9101282149.AA24963@genbank.bio.net> Date: 28 Jan 91 21:48:00 GMT Sender: daemon@genbank.bio.net Lines: 32 With reference to Roy Smith's question about Fasta speed, (although this does not specifically address his question regarding PC's running FASTA), we recently had the opportunity to test Fasta on a VAX 9000 - 210, and compare the results to machines currently in our laboratory or accessible to us (To show relative performance, WordSearch and Find times are also included): { all times rounded to the nearest second } CPU Seconds Ratio ---------------------------- -------------------------- CONVEX VAX CRAY VAX CONVEX/ 8650/ CRAY/ C230 8650 XMP24 9000 9000 9000 9000 Fasta v1.5a + 79 88 28 15 5.3 5.9 1.9 WordSearch GCG 6 + 270 292 na 42 6.4 7.0 - Find GCG 6 * 205 110 na 19 10.8 5.8 - na - program not available + humraf12 (49 nt) vs GenBank Primate Database (Rel. 65 - 6997 sequences 8,434,211 nt). * 5aa vs PIR1,PIR2,PIR3 (Rel. 26 - 25,814 sequences 7,348,950 aa) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark A. Gunnell | Internet: gunnell@ncifcrf.gov Sci. Applications Analyst | Bitnet: gunnell%ncifcrf.gov@cunyvm.bitnet Advanced Scientific Computing Lab.| Phone: (301) 846-5779 PRI/DynCorp | NCI-FCRDC | PO Box B, Bldg 430 | Frederick, MD 21702 USA | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------