Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!mcsun!unido!uklirb!shell
From: timm@runx.oz.au (Tim Menzies)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.shells
Subject: Re: Performance tests
Message-ID: <7478@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de>
Date: 20 Jan 91 03:32:27 GMT
Sender: shell@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de
Organization: RUNX Un*x Timeshare.  Sydney, Australia.
Lines: 14
Approved: shell@informatik.uni-kl.de
Posted-Date: Wed Jan 23 08:20:33 GMT 1991

In article <7463@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de> acha@CS.CMU.EDU (Anurag Acharya) writes:
>In article <7441@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de> dowless@sae.sae.com (Alan Dowless) writes:

[stuff deleted re rule-based performance tests]

I think that having some way of comparing different rule systems is a good
idea. May I suggest that the comparision be based on that old
favourite, the missionary & cannibal problem?

--
 _--_|\  Tim Menzies (timm@runxtsa.oz)        
/      \ HiSoft Expert Systems Group,	     
\_.--._/ 2-6 Orion Rd, Lane Cove, NSW, 2066 
         61 2 9297729(voice),61 2 4280200(fax)