Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: judice@sulaco.enet.dec.com (Louis J. Judice  25-Jan-1991 1110)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: NorTel Gets US Military Order
Message-ID: <16424@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 25 Jan 91 16:41:00 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 24
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 67, Message 7 of 11


I don't think there's anything ironic about telecom professionals
being blown up in our first attacks on Bagdad. Telecommunications,
railroads, police and fire departments are all civilian staffed
organizations that are an integral part of a country's infrastructure.
This infrastructure is the first target of an attack.

Rather than being ironic, I'd consider it to be almost a "compliment"
to be part of a profession that is so important to a nation's
security. People working in high profile locations are doubtlessly
aware that they are at greater risk of attack than other locations.

Believe me, living less than a mile from the AT&T network operations
center, I know full well that there are several Soviet warheads aimed
at me all the time!

I don't really think this is an appropriate place to start or continue
any kind of discussion of the MERITS of attacking any particular
country, but I certainly accept the idea that if you're going to
attack and win, you do things like target telephone switching centers
and microwave towers.


ljj