Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Void function pointers
Message-ID: <14974@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 25 Jan 91 17:13:38 GMT
References: <2887@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> <SARROYO.91Jan24120512@govtdev-11w9.shearson.com> <1991Jan24.181041.4894@Think.COM>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 6

In article <1991Jan24.181041.4894@Think.COM> barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) writes:
>In article <SARROYO.91Jan24120512@govtdev-11w9.shearson.com> sarroyo@govtdev-11w9.shearson.com (Suzanne Arroyo) writes:
>>	foo ( 7, 3.131592653938789, (void(*)(int, double) )bar);
>Is this actually guaranteed to work right?

No, for as Lincoln said, calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.