Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Catching termination of child process and system() call
Message-ID: <14977@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 25 Jan 91 17:22:11 GMT
References: <1991Jan24.023750.19569@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <14965@smoke.brl.mil> <1991Jan25.022950.10683@tkou02.enet.dec.com>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 11

In article <1991Jan25.022950.10683@tkou02.enet.dec.com> diamond@jit345.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond) writes:
>In article <14965@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>>In article <1991Jan24.023750.19569@tkou02.enet.dec.com> diamond@jit345.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond) writes:
>>>In article <YANG.91Jan23133130@newyork.nff.ncl.omron.co.jp> yang@nff.ncl.omron.co.jp (YANG Liqun) writes:
>>>>It should be wait((int *)0).
>>>It should be wait((union wait *)0) in BSD.
>>No, it's wait((int*)0) in all flavors of UNIX and POSIX.
>No, it's wait((union wait *)0) in systems that implement the bogus attempt
>that we all know about.

No, it's wait((int*)0) in all flavors of UNIX and POSIX.