Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!happy.colorado.edu!hsrender
From: hsrender@happy.colorado.edu
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Myths about ST: was Is Smalltalk for real in MS-DOS?
Message-ID: <1991Jan25.142417.1@happy.colorado.edu>
Date: 25 Jan 91 20:24:17 GMT
References: <1991Jan4.004138.7013@ashtate> <22574@well.sf.ca.us> <2961.279ffcba@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
Sender: news@csn.org (news)
Organization: Colorado SuperNet Inc.
Lines: 12
Nntp-Posting-Host: 128.198.1.246

In article <2961.279ffcba@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>, klimas@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
> In article <22574@well.sf.ca.us>, jjacobs@well.sf.ca.us (Jeffrey Jacobs) writes:
> 	Based upon actual industrial experiences, I believe this posting
> 	is fraught with misconceptions and myths that seriously undermine
> 	its credibility.

Could you provide some proof of your statements?  I personally would like
to counter Smalltalk detractors with something better than "this guy
said so."  

hal render
render@zeppo.colorado.edu