Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!hoss.unl.edu!greg
From: greg@hoss.unl.edu (Lig Lury Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Personal Privacy Violations
Message-ID: <1991Jan12.205826.10118@hoss.unl.edu>
Date: 12 Jan 91 20:58:26 GMT
References: <465.2786E0CF@Tqc.FidoNet.Org> <1991Jan06.180558.4405@looking.on.ca> <1991Jan10.204101.29296@hoss.unl.edu>
Sender: news@hoss.unl.edu (Network News Administer)
Organization: University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Lines: 19

... greg@hoss.unl.edu (Lig Lury Jr.) writes:

>Perhaps I should clarify this statement.  What I mean is that currently
>electronic text is not press.  So if you take Lotus to court and lose, you
>will gain a status of electronic text as speech/press, and if you win,
>well you've prevented them from putting out the questionable CD ROM.

And of course, Lotus will appeal until they win, gaining the status, or
perhaps a settlement, and we're back at square one, but still have
prevented them.

Is that better?  Sorry but I am not an expert in law, nor do I claim to be
one.

--
   ///   ____   \\\
   | |/ /    \ \| |    greg@hoss.unl.edu
    \\_( \==/ )_//     Lig Lury Jr.
        \__\\/