Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!unhd!oz!oddjob
From: oddjob@oz.plymouth.edu (Andrew C. Stoffel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Again: compiling c68 with ACK
Summary: where can I find this stuff (archive sites ?)
Keywords: cc.c, c68
Message-ID: <1991Jan13.014107.3785@oz.plymouth.edu>
Date: 13 Jan 91 01:41:07 GMT
References: <41444@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Sender: oddjob@oz.plymouth.edu
Reply-To: oddjob@oz.plymouth.edu (Andrew C. Stoffel)
Followup-To: comp.os.minix
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.
Lines: 24

In article <41444@nigel.ee.udel.edu> HBO043%DJUKFA11.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu (Christoph van Wuellen) writes:
>I got some messages indicating that I should state:
>The problems you encounter when compiling c68 with ACK are most
>probably due to bugs in the old ld/cv programs.
>They fail on big programs although you cannot be sure they fail.
Any way to tell ? I got c68 to compile (eventually) and would like to
know if it is any good (at least to recompile itself)

>There is a new linker which combines ld/cv functionality (Author:
>F. Croes) which should be used instead of cv/ld
where is it and what is it called ???
>The cc.c posted along with c68 II.5 supports the new linker.
Where can I find that ???!!! cc.c wasn't in the recently posted
version of c68 (that also includes the 386 version)
>C.v.W.
an additional question: how big should the library created with the
floating point stuff (for the version of c68 mentioned above) be ??
Thanx
-Andy-

-- 
|"The Snark WAS a Boojum, you see!"|Good   : acs@unhd.unh.edu       |
|"Reality !?! Isn't that something |Better : ANDYS@psc.plymouth.edu |
|    you sprinkle on ice ??"       |Best   : oddjob@oz.plymouth.edu |