Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!samsung!uunet!mcsun!corton!imag!pierre
From: pierre@imag.fr (Pierre LAFORGUE)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: Phase 1 vs. Phase 2 (was Re: Apple's New Ethernet Card)
Message-ID: <17325@imag.imag.fr>
Date: 24 Jan 91 09:44:19 GMT
References: <29360@usc> <38141@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@imag.imag.fr
Reply-To: Pierre.Laforgue@imag.fr
Organization: IMAG Institute, University of Grenoble, France
Lines: 16
Nntp-Posting-Host: localhost

In article <38141@cup.portal.com>, MacUserLabs@cup.portal.com (Stephan - Somogyi) writes:
|> Apple wants people to stop using Phase 1.
|>  ...
|> The majority of MISniks I've spoken to spend a great deal of time
|> complaining about how migration from Phase 1 to Phase 2 is such a
|> pain. No-one said it would be easy. Every LT<->ET router manufacturer
|> that I'm aware of supports both Phase 1 and Phase 2, and only one
|> router that I can think of can't route between Phase 1 Enet and Phase
|> 2 Enet.

Do you mean you can use all the Appletalk Phase I only softwares (e.g. CAP)
if you have at least one "modern" gateway (KFPS4 for instance) configured
with the PhaseI/PhaseII transition option, and various old ones (e.g. KFPS2) ?
I would be grateful to who experimented this to send me a mail.
-- 
Pierre LAFORGUE                                            laforgue@imag.Fr