Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!herald.usask.ca!weyr!f70.n140.z1.FIDONET.ORG!David.Plummer
From: David.Plummer@f70.n140.z1.FIDONET.ORG (David Plummer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Commodore Research and Developm
Message-ID: <11.278AB9A5@weyr.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 6 Jan 91 18:05:32 GMT
Sender: ufgate@weyr.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:140/70 - Double Check, Regina Sask
Lines: 25

T>    If a small company like Epix -- with an R&D budget much smaller than
T> Commodore's -- can produce what is essentially a handheld Amiga, comple
 
Gee, I wasn't aware that the Amiga was 6502 based... the Lynx sure is. 
I guess Commodore should follow your advice (Like Epix (sic) did,
apparently).  Then they too could go broke, sell out to Atari, and
maintain a staff of about 2 programmers and an answering machine.  I
never realized what a visionary you really were.
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
=     plummerd@uregina.ca or plumme@hercules.uregina.ca (BITNET)      =
=---------------------------------------------------------------------=
= Amiga__                     | Make it possible for programmer's to  =
= __  ///  IBMUBMWEALLBM4IBM  | write code in English and you'll soon =
= \\\///                      | discover that programmers cannot      =
=  \XX/                       | write in English.                     =
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



--  
David Plummer - via FidoNet node 1:140/22
UUCP: ...!herald!weyr!70!David.Plummer
Domain: David.Plummer@f70.n140.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Standard Disclaimers Apply...