Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!know!tba From: tba@pws.bull.com (Todd Aubin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: caution on vulgar replies Message-ID: <20695@know.pws.bull.com> Date: 28 Jan 91 03:12:54 GMT Organization: Bull Worldwide Information Systems, Inc. Lines: 43 Just to let those who are new to the net know... It is a documented offense to reply to a usenet poster and use vulgar langauge. I am currently involved with a lawsuit against a usenet post at a university in Calafornia who said mail to me via a system at his school, and through a system at my company. I don't know how many people know this. I have not use vulgar language (F__, S__, etc) when posting because I have been posting for many years and have learned by reading, but I was astounded by the fact that so many lawsuits have been successfull. Incidentally, the worst they do is remove the individual from the school, with no criminal record. I have learned a lot, but it has cost a lot. I found out that freedom of speach works as long as you have purchases the medium of broadcast of have aproval of the broadcast material form the broadcastee. (No so with the person I am suing according to PacTel and his University) This all started when I had accidentally posted to the wrong group and I recieved a letter sent to me which contained several vulgar statements, verbal abuse in a specific sense, from a person in CA, who among other things promotes his ego in his signature ("never heard of ____ University, than you're stupid). If you have had simular reactions from this person, please mail evidence. I need only two more accounts concerning this individual and I can remove him, according to the University. Sorry to bore the rest of you. -- Todd B. Aubin | uunet!hbiso!tba or tba@pws.bull.com ISO Unix Marketing Support | "Boring disclaimer:" The above views Bull Information Systems, Inc. | are mine and are not meant to reflect Technology Park, Billerica, MA 01821 | the views of my employer.