Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.misc:292 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:293 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: How do we change the scheduler? (Was Re: Multitasking at home...) Message-ID: <7629@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 27 Jan 91 20:08:35 GMT References: <7511@sugar.hackercorp.com> <1991Jan18.061539.14527@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Reply-To: peter@taronga.uucp.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 26 In article mwm@raven.relay.pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) writes: > Yeah - GNU Emacs works like a charm, and ADPro can handle some > _really_ large images in 1.5M. And AmigaVision runs alongside both of > those, just fine. Where did you say that beachfront property was, > Peter? I stand by what I said. I can run all the apps I want without worrying about which order I load them or what is going to conflict with what. Of course you're gonna get applications that don't even run *once* in 1.5 Meg. There are always people out there writing oversized, overrated, and underdesigned programs. And people willing to buy more and more RAM to run them. I'm quite happy with Digipaint, Sculpt, Manx C, etcetera. And even if AmigaVision ran on my 3000 it's no use to me... there's no separate runtime that'll fit on my 1000, so I can't use it to write stuff for my son. For me Amigavision was worth every penny I spent on it. Lucky it was free... Anyone got any suggestions for a *small* multimedia authoring program? In any case, this thread does not belong in .misc, but rather in .advocacy. How about leaving it there this time? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .