Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!rex!uflorida!gatech!ncsuvx!news From: kdarling@hobbes.ncsu.edu (Kevin Darling) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: How do we change the scheduler? (Was Re: Multitasking at home...) Message-ID: <1991Jan28.023844.24706@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> Date: 28 Jan 91 02:38:44 GMT References: <3889@orbit.cts.com> Sender: news@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu (USENET News System) Organization: NCSU Computing Center Lines: 19 In <3889@orbit.cts.com> chucks@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Erik Funkenbusch) writes: >> Sidenote: I'm not sure why some mention that System 7 isn't out yet. >> Amiga 2.0 isn't out yet for 500's, I thought. [me] > >BUT 2.0 *IS* available to 3000 owners. 7.0 is only available to developers. >bringing 2.0 into ANY argument is quite valid because of all the 3000 owners >that use it. when a Mac ships with ANY version of 7.0 then it too can be >brought into the fray of things. Gosh, after watching people use 2.0 for comparisons long before *IT* came out, it's great that you feel this way. I suppose this means that we also shouldn't mention future 040/etc cards for the A3000 cpu slot to others? Or coming video boards? Or? (ahem ;-) >> This kind of argument is a two-way street; and obviously >> nulls out within a fairly short period of time. cheers - kev Plus, I think we might agree that waiting until all arguments are "valid", would take some of the fun out of things.