Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!metro!otc!elson From: elson@otc.otca.oz (Elson Markwick) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio Subject: Re: sonix Keywords: soix Message-ID: <2208@otc.otca.oz> Date: 29 Jan 91 05:46:59 GMT References: <1991Jan25.085753.6459@daimi.aau.dk> Reply-To: elson@otc.UUCP (Elson Markwick) Organization: OTC Development Unit, Australia Lines: 30 In article <1991Jan25.085753.6459@daimi.aau.dk> pilgrim@daimi.aau.dk (Jakob G}rdsted) writes: > To put it all together in a single question: Where are all the >musicprograms, that should look like Sonix and be made in the 9O's ? >Am I the only one, that miss notes and hate columns with A#4 DF23's ? > >Everybody with an opinion about notes and bars and soundtrashers and >... post your opinions! I long for debate about this! >(And Deluxe Music Confusion Kit is not the way to go!) I tend to like "soundtrasher" myself, but mainly for the reasons you outlined I HATED Sonix because the instrument editor sucks (or maybe that's just my own lack of ability to get it to do anything worthwhile), and that damned 8SVX sample format. Oh and there's no realtime record facility on Sonix either. (Come to that a real time record facility on Soundtracker that allows you to record more than one segment at a time would be kinda nice for all us jammers). Another thing you've gotta remember too is that not everyone can read music (in the notes and bars sense) but most everyone can do *something* reasonable with the soundtracker type interface. 'Course what I would really like to see is a pair of 40kHz DACs stuck inside the Ami, so you could get a really decent cymbal sound out of the thing. Cheers, Elson -- Elson Markwick | The only good cat |ACSnet: elson@otc.otca.oz.au OTC R & D Unit |is a stir-fried cat|UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!otc.otca.oz.au!elson Ph: 02 287 3142| ALF |Internet: elson%otc.otca.oz.au@uunet.uu.net Fax:02 287 3299| |Snail: GPO Box 7000, Sydney 2001, Australia