Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!uunet!cbmvax!daveb
From: daveb@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Berezowski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: V.32 modem evaluations
Message-ID: <18244@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 29 Jan 91 15:32:33 GMT
Reply-To: daveb@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Berezowski)
Organization: POST, Memphis, Tenn.
Lines: 35
References:


	Check out the January 1991 issue of Data Communications for a complete
comparrison of most V.32 modems.  The article is entitled 'Test High-Speed
Modems the Right Way' and starts on page 82.  They test the following models:

Company			Model
-------			-----
Digicom Systems Inc	9624E+
Hayes			Ultra Smartmodem 9600
Microcom Inc.		QX/4232hs
Multi-Tech Systems Inc.	MultiModem V.32
NEC America Inc		N9635E
Octocom Systems Inc	OSI8596
Okidata			Okitel 9600 V.32
Penril DataComm		ALX V.32/14.4M
Telebit Corp		T1600
UDS Inc.		V.32/42bis
US Robotics Inc.	Courier HST Dual Standard


	The only two ommisions from the list (that I'm aware of) would be:

Company			Model
-------			-----
Codex			???? (I know they have a V.32 modem)
Ventel			9600 PLUS


	For more information on the Bell and CCITT standards for modem
communications, check out the November 1990 issue of Byte, page 353.


daveb
-- 
David Berezowski	{caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveb