Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!viusys!uxui!unislc!dave
From: dave@unislc.uucp (Dave Martin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: Does Commodore really want to sell WB2.0?
Message-ID: <1991Jan26.021726.10571@unislc.uucp>
Date: 26 Jan 91 02:17:26 GMT
References: <17770@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Organization: unisys
Lines: 18

From article <17770@cbmvax.commodore.com>, by higgin@cbmvax.commodore.com (Paul Higginbottom - CATS):
> In article <50784@sequent.UUCP> cseaman@sequent.UUCP (Chris "The Bartman" Seaman) writes:
> $This leads to the following question.  Given that the feature list for
> $2.0 is (or should be) frozen, and the current revisions are bug fixes,
> $is there any likelyhood that Commodore has already taken steps such as
> $finalizing documentation, packaging, etc.?  I know this sounds like the
> 
> Note: We're shipping completed 2.0 documentation with the A3000.
> 
> 	Paul.

Yes, but when will the 2.0 RKMs be available?

-- 
VAX Headroom	Speaking for myself only... blah blah blahblah blah...
Internet: DMARTIN@CC.WEBER.EDU                 dave@saltlcy-unisys.army.mil
uucp:     dave@unislc.uucp or use the Path: line.
Now was that civilized?  No, clearly not.  Fun, but in no sense civilized.