Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!csc.anu.edu.au!manuel!ccadfa!prolix!dac
From: dac@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: EMAIL (Re:  UUCP Summary)
Message-ID: <18986b13.ARN27d3@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au>
Date: 28 Jan 91 12:47:47 GMT
References: <187f5759.ARN09580@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au> 
 <663472197-comp.sys.amiga@chsdip.UUCP><34041@mango.athertn.Atherton.COM> 
 <1889eb6d.ARN09885@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au> <7627@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Reply-To: ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!prolix!dac@munnari.OZ.AU
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Organization: I'm not an Organization - I'm a person!
Lines: 28

In article <7627@sugar.hackercorp.com>, Peter da Silva writes:

> In article <1889eb6d.ARN09885@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au> ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!prolix!Dac writes:
> > [I have to pay $A1000 if I want EMAIL access to the net, and I cannot afford
> > that, since I'm just an individual, not a corporation!]
 
> To Dac, and other users with no Email access:
 
> If you don't have Email access, please include another way to get hold of you
> in your .signature. A telephone number, postal address, etcetera would be

Thanks for your concern, Peter.

I'm in the process of fixing that oversight, and getting a mail account via
somewhere in Sydney (for a much reduced cost).

I once said that mail was unimportant.  I didn't know enough about the net to
realise the depth of my innaccuracy.  :-/

Until then, my return address (as above) IS a valid mail address.  I'd rather
not get mail though, because I CANNOT reply.  Yet.  When this changes, my
siggie will inform the world!  :^)

Dac
--
 _l _  _   // Andrew Clayton. Canberra, Australia.         I Post  .
(_](_l(_ \X/  ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!prolix!dac                     . .  I am.                   
-------- I cannot send or receive email. Not to anyone at all. Not even you.