Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!rutgers!cbmvax!bj From: bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: GadTools functionality Message-ID: <18232@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 29 Jan 91 01:10:39 GMT References: <91023.105132GHGAQA4@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be> <18096@cbmvax.commodore.com> Reply-To: bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 29 In article mwm@pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) writes: [ re: Gadtools ... ] > >I.e. - "We're going to fix it, but you shouldn't use it." That's the >answer I got last time. To me, that indicates the what I said above - >that you don't consider this a problem, but something you're going to >have to kludge in a fix for. ^^^^^^ Simply stated, Peter does not kludge things. His work is well thought out and well implemented. Implications to the contrary are off base >This is _not_ making things simpler. I suspect that most folks writing Intuition stuff will find Gadtools to be a major improvement. I suspect that you will use it too since to do otherwise makes for a LOT more work to do the same thing. A lot of folks think it's ok to trade pain for principle... >