Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!purdue!haven!wam!walrus From: walrus@wam.umd.edu (Udo K Schuermann) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: PowerWindows Keywords: power windows 2.5 bugs spam Message-ID: <1991Jan25.210054.9388@wam.umd.edu> Date: 25 Jan 91 21:00:54 GMT References: <5821.9101231729@s1.sys.uea.ac.uk> Sender: usenet@wam.umd.edu (USENET Posting) Reply-To: walrus@wam.umd.edu (Udo K Schuermann) Organization: University of Maryland at College Park Lines: 42 In article <5821.9101231729@s1.sys.uea.ac.uk> cmp8133@information-systems.east-anglia.ac.uk ("S. Hawes") writes: >I want to buy PowerWindows 2.5 for designing userinterfaces. >However, I'd like to program in Modula2 using Benchmark's Modula >2 construction set. Does anyone know whether that's possible using >PowerWindows? >I also heard that with the >packages comes a 'translation utility'. Is this correct ? First the good news: PowerWindows 2.5 supports Modula2. It mentions TDI (yuck) Modula2 specifically. I'm not sure about a 'translation utility.' Subjectively speaking, PW is a blessing when you're dealing with menus, lots of gadgets, and such stuff. Now the bad news: PowerWindows 2.5 has some bugs which are annoying, at least in the Manx/Lattice C code generation. I don't know if this will also affect Modula2 or other code. Specifically: struct IntuiText 1IText1 ... struct MenuItem 1Menu1 ... ^^ These extraneous digits (always "1") are VERY bothersome. They require editing of the generated source code, and they piss me off :( Does anyone know what's causing these? Left-over debugging statement? Overall, I agree with whoever said some time ago, something along the lines that PowerWindows 2.5 has enough bugs to make you want to rewrite it, but is not quite buggy enough to make it useless enough to force you to do it. One of these days ... ___ ._. Udo Schuermann / | \ "There is no Way to Peace. ( ) walrus@wam.umd.edu \/|\/ Peace is the Way!" -- Gandhi. ~~~