Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: ifar355@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (David H. Huang)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: .bsq
Message-ID: <43014@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 23 Jan 91 17:13:04 GMT
References: <21012302510654@lax.wisc.edu>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: ifar355@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (David H. Huang)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 18

In article <21012302510654@lax.wisc.edu> THINGVOL@LAX.WISC.EDU writes:
>Why don't Binscii files end in .bnc instead of .bsq??

Nobody knows... actually Binscii files end in .bsc. Binscii'd shrunk files
end in .bsq. As I had commented a few months ago, I would have thought that
Binscii'd shrunk files would end in .bsk (.bsc + .shk = .bsk, right?)

Also, people seem to stick with 3 letter extensions. It's not like we're
in the MSDOS world, right?

How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Roll Tootsie
Pop?

-- 
David Huang                                 |
Internet: ifar355@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu        |     "My ganglion is stuck in
UUCP: ...!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu!ifar355 |      a piece of chewing gum!"
America Online: DrWho29                     |