Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!opusc!ken
From: ken@opusc.csd.scarolina.edu (Ken Sallenger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Questions, things for sale
Summary: cubase vs. notator question
Message-ID: <1991Jan23.211749.27371@opusc.csd.scarolina.edu>
Date: 23 Jan 91 21:17:49 GMT
References: <193@rosie.NeXT.COM> <7340065@hpfcso.HP.COM>
Organization: Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia
Lines: 13

In article <7340065@hpfcso.HP.COM> mjs@hpfcso.HP.COM (Marc Sabatella) writes:

=> ...mentioned Cubase,...
=> Can you tell us more about it?  Comparison with Notator would be especially
=> appreciated.

In the February 1991 issue of _Electronic Musician_, there's a comparative
review of the latest versions of Cubase and Notator.  I don't remember
who wrote the review, but as I recall he praised Cubase for sequencing,
Notator for scoring.
-- 
     Ken Sallenger / ken@bigbird.csd.scarolina.edu / +1 803 777-6551
     Computer Services Division / 1244 Blossom ST / Columbia, SC 29208