Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!agate!shelby!msi.umn.edu!noc.MR.NET!gacvx2.gac.edu!hhdist
From: CW%APG.PH.UCL.AC.UK@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: <None>
Message-ID: <3D11B5D460006C39@gacvx2.gac.edu>
Date: 23 Jan 91 18:15:38 GMT
Lines: 6
To: HANDHELDS@gac.edu
Return-path: <@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU:CW@APG.PH.UCL.AC.UK>
To: HANDHELDS@gac.edu
Via:      UK.AC.UCL.PH.APG; 23 JAN 91 18:19:48 GMT

***48SX***48SX***48SX***48SX***48SX***48SX***48SX***48SX***48SX***48SX***
Everybody: When I said that the routines were not too safe I meant that
my routines (STRIP and DRESS) do no error checking, and will cause problems
if given the wrong arguaments. The routine PACK by Joseph Horn seems to be
very robust and safe. Sorry Joseph.

   Conrad