Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!philabs!crpmks!marcs From: marcs@crpmks.UUCP (Marc Snyder) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: QEMM386 or 386MAX? Advice wanted. Message-ID: <1435@crpmks.UUCP> Date: 23 Jan 91 16:00:51 GMT References: Reply-To: marcs@crpmks.UUCP (Marc Snyder) Distribution: usa Organization: Ciba-Geigy Corporation Lines: 18 In article kusumoto@chsun1.uchicago.edu (Bob Kusumoto) writes: > >... I believe both only allow TSRs to be loaded high in real or standard >modes (you can use the 386 Enh mode if you don't let these programs relocated >your TSRs into High RAM, although I've read some press that people have been >able to load TSRs high and run in 386 Enh mode as well, but I haven't seen it >work yet. I am currently running QEMM 5.11 with Windows 3.0. I am also using DEC's PCSA (now Pathworks, I believe). I have loaded almost all of the drivers required by PCSA into high memory, and run Windows in enhanced mode. The machine in question is an AST 386sx/16 with 3MB of RAM. I have this configuration operating on several other machines as well. -- Marc Snyder UUCP: ...philabs!crpmks!marcs System Administrator ...gaboon!crpmks!marcs Ciba-Geigy Corporation Hawthorne, New York Work: 914.785.2284 Play: 914.347.6440