Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!agate!shelby!neon!Sunburn.Stanford.EDU!commons
From: commons@Sunburn.Stanford.EDU (Peter Commons)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.games
Subject: Re: Upgrading Strategic Conquest 2.0 to 3.0
Message-ID: <1991Jan29.192055.14738@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 29 Jan 91 19:20:55 GMT
References: <1991Jan29.000820.9303@Neon.Stanford.EDU> <91028.224311CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu> <11938@ur-cc.UUCP>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 17

>Changes from Strategic Conquest 2.0: (to 3.0)
>
>
>The two player game is more fair. [I'm not certain i understand what this
>really means]
>

To clarify this element: in a two player (i.e. two human players) game, 
each player starts out on one side of the board each with a home island with
the same number of cities.



--
Peter Commons		
commons@cs.stanford.edu	
Computer Science Department, Stanford University