Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!world!unixland!bill
From: bill@unixland.uucp (Bill Heiser)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Need partitioning opinions.
Message-ID: <1991Jan26.021415.12430@unixland.uucp>
Date: 26 Jan 91 02:14:15 GMT
References: <1991Jan21.224520.27427@iitmax.iit.edu> <673@hitachi.uucp>
Organization: Think_Tank BBS & Public Access Unix
Lines: 22

In article <673@hitachi.uucp> jon@hitachi.UUCP (Jon Ryshpan) writes:
>root and everything else.  Under BSD, you can back up by partition;
>this can speed backups up if you put static stuff on some of the
>partitions.  But this doesn't apply to backups under sysv.

Why do you say this can't be done under sysv?  How about ffsdump, rdump (or whatever), or "find . -mount" ...

>
>If you are afraid that your news spool directory can get out of
>control, you *may* want to put it on a seperate partition so that it
>can fill its own partition and not the whole drive.  But I don't
>recommend this.

Why do you not recommend having a separate partition for news spool?



-- 
home:	...!{uunet,bloom-beacon,esegue}!world!unixland!bill
	bill@unixland.uucp    Public Access Unix - Esix SYSVR3
508-655-3848(12/24)  508-651-8723(12/24/96-HST)  508-651-8733(12/24/96-PEP-V32)
other:	heiser@world.std.com